- removed comment
Test "Binary black hole GW150914" example
Issue #2172
resolved
Before each release, check that http://einsteintoolkit.org/gallery/bbh/index.html still works and produces correct output.
Then upload the results file to https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/www/downloads/
Then update the last run time on http://einsteintoolkit.org/gallery/bbh/index.html and update the plots. Prefix commit messages with “bbh: “ in the first line (see eg the output of git log --format=oneline gallery/bbh/index.html).
Keyword: None
Comments (49)
-
-
- changed status to resolved
- removed comment
-
reporter
- changed status to closed
- edited description
-
reporter
- changed status to open
Reopened after ET_2019_03 release.
-
reporter
- edited description
-
assigned issue to
helvi witek
-
reporter
- changed milestone to ET_2019_10
-
reporter
- changed status to resolved
-
reporter
- removed responsible
- changed milestone to ET_2020_04
- marked as major
-
reporter
- changed status to open
Opened for ET_2020_04 release.
-
reporter
- changed milestone to ET_2020_05
-
reporter
Alois Schaffarczyk agreed to test this for ET_2020_05.
-
reporter
@Atul Kedia created a pull request with updates: https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/www/pull-requests/5/updates-on-bbh-gallery-test-page-1
-
reporter
-
assigned issue to
Atul Kedia
-
assigned issue to
-
- changed status to resolved
Peter Schaffarczyk and I worked on the test. We ran the test simulation on Peter's cluster and found similar results as previously plotted results. We were able to regenerated most of the figures in the website but not all. We are going to continue to update the website with more info about our simulation, and steps to generate the figures.
-
reporter
- changed status to open
-
reporter
- changed milestone to ET_2020_11
- removed responsible
-
reporter
-
assigned issue to
Steven R. Brandt
@Steven R. Brandt agreed to handle this for ET_2020_11.
-
assigned issue to
-
reporter
- changed status to resolved
Closing after release.
-
reporter
- changed status to open
Reopened for 20201_05 release
-
reporter
- changed milestone to ET_2021_05
-
reporter
In today’s ET call, https://docs.einsteintoolkit.org/et-docs/Meeting_agenda#2021-04-29, the issue of adding presync parameters was discussed and it was decided to try adding:
Cactus::presync_mode = "mixed-error"to all gallery parfiles.
-
reporter
Cheng-Hsin Cheng will take care of this for 2021_11
-
reporter
- changed milestone to ET_2021_11
- removed responsible
-
reporter
- changed status to resolved
-
reporter
- changed status to open
-
reporter
- changed status to resolved
-
reporter
- changed status to open
-
reporter
- edited description
-
reporter
- changed milestone to ET_2022_11
-
reporter
Allen Wen will be handling this example for ET_2022_11
-
reporter
- edited description
-
reporter
-
assigned issue to
Allen Wen
-
assigned issue to
-
reporter
- edited description
-
reporter
- changed status to resolved
-
reporter
-
assigned issue to
Steven R. Brandt
@Steven R. Brandt will (may) handle this for ET_2023_05.
-
assigned issue to
-
reporter
- changed milestone to ET_2023_05
-
reporter
- changed status to open
-
@Steven R. Brandt Has this been completed? The website hasn’t been updated if it has.
-
I did the create-submit, now I need to follow up with more submits.
-
reporter
- changed status to resolved
Steve updated the gallery on 06-Jun-2023.
-
reporter
- changed milestone to ET_2023_11
- removed responsible_account_id
-
reporter
@Deborah Ferguson will handle this for ET_2023_11
-
reporter
- changed status to open
-
reporter
-
assigned issue to
Deborah Ferguson
-
assigned issue to
-
I have performed the simulation and confirmed that the output data looks the same as that on Zenodo. I’ve uploaded the tar.gz of the data and have updated the website with today’s date as the last time this simulation was tested.
-
- changed status to resolved
-
@Roland Haas @Deborah Ferguson I checked the website after resolving and noticed that it still said
This example was last tested on 06-Jun-2023.
-
Oh sorry, I submitted a pull request but I don’t know if it’s been merged in
-
reporter
Merged. I think you even told me about the pull request. Sorry about that .
- Log in to comment
- Assignee
- Type
- Priority
- Status
- resolved
- Component
- EinsteinToolkit website
- Milestone
- ET_2023_11
- Version
- development version
- Votes
- 0
- Watchers
- 4
I ran the simulation using the master branch and compared the data with the data provided by the Gallery example. The comparison is available in an attachment on this ticket. During the 2018-08-27 weekly ET meeting, it was agreed that the differences were within reasonable tolerance.